Header-farmlandgrab-en3
Icon-globe   Icon-fb   Icon-twitter   Icon-rss  
Home About events Gallery Publish
Subscribe
Help

Who's involved?

Archives

Languages

Special content

France withdraws from NAFSN: agribusiness is not the cure for hunger!
Published: 09 Feb 2018
Comments (0) Print Email this

NGOs have documented the negative consequences of projects promoted through the alliance: land grabbing, peasants’ debt, introduction of GM crops and the creation of growth corridors which are agricultural tax havens

Launched in 2012, this initiative favours the interest of transnational agribusiness corporations to the detriment of peasant agriculture. It has been denounced by hundreds of organisations1 for its negative impacts on food security and peasantry in the ten involved African countries2. The stakes behind France withdrawal is now to recognize that the so-called « magic bullet » mixing public-private partnerships and legislative reforms to create an enabling environment for transnational companies’ investments, is not the solution to fight hunger. On the contrary, it goes against the interest of local populations, marginalizes family farms – although they produce 70% of the global food items – to the benefit of a few transnational companies which are given all the facilities : finance, taxes, land tenure.

Our organisations have repeatedly documented the negative consequences of such a system in Burkina Faso or in Ivory Coast: land grabbing, peasants’ debt, introduction of GMO crops and settlement of growth corridors which are true agricultural tax heavens, etc3.

France withdrawal should be taken into account by the other NAFSN partners, such as the European Union and African States. Germany, another main contributor to the NAFSN, must also announce its withdrawal. This does not clear any of these actors from redressing the negative impacts of this initiative as they remain responsible for it.

Beyond NAFSN, France must learn from this failure and no longer engage in investment projects and initiatives comporting similar flaws. The exclusion of farmers’ organisations from the governance, the absence accountability frameworks and the prioritisation of transnational companies to the detriment of local actors is not the cure to hunger.

Thus, while world hunger is rising4, the withdrawal from NAFSN must be the signal for a genuine rethink of mobilized supports. In coherence with this decision, the 400 million euros France annually affects to food security in countries of the Global South should entirely go to the development of peasant agroecology. Our organisations expect this to be recorded and implemented during the review of the French strategy and the French development agency’s sectorial framework, scheduled to take place in the coming months.


Contacts 

Action against Hunger : Mathieu FORTOUL – [email protected] – +33 (0)6 77 19 03 68 
CCFD-Terre Solidaire : Karine Appy – [email protected] – +33 (0) 6 66 12 33 02
Oxfam France : Bertrand Noiret – [email protected] – +33 (0)6 85 26 01 08

Notes :

Source: ACF



Post a comment
Name

Email address (optional - if you want a reply)

Comment

Sign the petition! 
Stand with Cambodian communities vs. Chinese company’s landgrabbing!
https://www.change.org/p/stand-with-cambodian-communities-vs-chinese-company-s-landgrabbing


Who's involved?

19 Mar 2018 - Washington, DC
World Bank Land Conference 2018
Smallfh_land-conference-2017 Spacer
23 Apr 2018 - New York
Global Ag Investing
Smallfh_gainy_c-mark_4col_v3 Spacer


Languages



Archives