Brazil: Stop land grabbing and violence for “fair and sustainable” palm oil!

Vila Gonçalves is surrounded by Agropalma’s oil palm plantations. (© Cicero Pedrosa Neto / Global Witness)

Rainforest Rescue | March 2023

Brazil: Stop land grabbing and violence for “fair and sustainable” palm oil!

Sign the petition

Palm oil from Brazil's Agropalma sports no less than ten different seals: Certified as organic, fair and sustainable, the oil is sold to food giants such as Ferrero, Kellogg’s and Nestlé. But much of the plantation land of this purported model company was likely grabbed illegally. Local communities complain of human rights abuses.

Agropalma, the largest palm oil producer in Brazil, is considered a global model for the industry. The group is certified with ten international seals for organic, fair and sustainable oil palm cultivation: These include the organic label of the EU (EU Organic Regulation), the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA Organic) and JAS from Japan, the fair trade label IBD from Brazil, as well as the Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) and Palm Oil Innovations Group (POIG) labels.

Agropalma’s palm oil customers are a Who’s Who of processed-food multinationals, including Danone, Ferrero (Nutella), Kellogg’s, Mars, Mondelez (Oreo), Nestlé, PepsiCo, Unilever (Ben & Jerry’s) and Upfield (Flora).

According to Agropalma, the 39,000 hectares of certified oil palm plantations, of which 4,000 hectares are organic, were cut into the Amazon rainforest in the state of Pará between 1982 and 2002. The group also manages 64,000 hectares of “protected forest”, in which it claims to operate climate protection (REDD+) projects.

But much of Agropalma's land apparently comes from the illegal appropriation of state-owned land, from local communities and from resident smallholders, Publica reports. In a detailed article on the palm oil company, the newspaper Ver O Fato headlined “Accused of land grabbing and with 58 thousand hectares cancelled by the courts, Agropalma is up for sale”.

Local people complain that the company resorts to violence and roadblocks and denies them access to public places such as rivers and cemeteries. Human rights organizations such as Global Witness have recorded serious human rights violations, while the Brazilian Bar Association has noted extremely poor working conditions, exploitation and severely restrictive contracts on Agropalma’s plantations.


Land grabbing and violence against local people

Agropalma's oil palm plantations and land overlap with the ancestral lands of the communities of Balsa, Turiaçu, Vila do Gonçalves and Vila dos Palmares do Vale Acará in the Brazilian state of Pará. The villages represented in the association ARQVA (Associação dos Remanescentes de Quilombos da Comunidade da Balsa, Turiaçu, Gonçalves e Vila Palmares do Vale do Acará), which are inhabited by an Afro-Brazilian (Quilombola) majority, accuse Agropalma of having taken the land by force and with fraudulent land titles1.

“Agropalma does not respect the decisions of either the judiciary or the Ministry of Justice,” explains Quilombola leader Joaquim dos Santos Pimenta, referring to rulings of the Court of Justice of the State of Pará, which in 2018 had blocked the registration of two Agropalma plantations2: “The lands of the Roda de Fogo and Castanheira farms were sold on the basis of false documents issued by a non-existent notary’s office and by unqualified persons,” the court stated. After Agropalma appealed, the Court of Justice of the State of Pará confirmed the cancellation of the registration of the two plantations3.

Elielson Pereira da Silva of the Federal University of Pará (UFPA), who has been studying the socio-ecological evolution of communities amid oil palm monocultures since 2019, explains: “We have documented a series of violations dating back to the 1980s, when the Quilombola were evicted from their land. The territory claimed by these families is overlapped by Agropalma land on the forged land registry entries”.4

Local people accuse Agropalma of using armed security guards to block access to public areas such as the banks of the Acará River, which winds through the rainforest in countless loops, as well as properties such as cemeteries. Fishing in the river is important for local food security. The company has blocked the traditional rights of way with gates, waste containers dropped in the middle of tracks, and deep trenches.

Agropalma denies the allegations

Agropalma comments that its corporate policy prohibits actions that impede legal and regular activities of human rights defenders. However, the company claims the right to protect its employees and assets. Agropalma denies taking violent action against the named communities and individuals, and states that there are no land claims of indigenous peoples that overlap with Agropalma’s land.

Agropalma Group

The Agropalma Group is part of Alfa, a Brazilian banking group that also encompasses tourism and construction companies. According to Valor Económico reports, Agropalma is to be sold off together with other companies of the Alfa Group5.

Agropalma, which claims to be largest sustainable palm oil producer in the Americas, cleared rainforest for its oil palm plantations between 1982 and 20026. Agropalma produces certified organic palm oil on 4,015 hectares and conventional palm oil on 36,000 hectares. Roads and factories account for another 3,200 hectares, and 64,000 hectares of “protected forest” bring the total land area controlled by the group to 107,000 hectares.

In addition to the oil palm plantations, Agropalma has six palm oil mills, two palm oil refineries and an export terminal. Agropalma states that about 95% of its exports go to Europe and 5% to the United States7.

Agropalma customers

Agropalma's palm oil customers include 20 agricultural multinationals, oil mill operators and food manufacturers, such as:

  1. AAK8

  2. ADM9

  3. Alnatura10

  4. Bunge11

  5. Cargill12

  6. Danone13

  7. Ferrero14

  8. General Mills15

  9. Hershey16

  10. Kellogg Company17

  11. Mars18

  12. Mondelez19

  13. Nestle20

  14. Olenex 21

  15. PepsiCo22

  16. Pz Cussons23

  17. Unilever24

  18. Upfield25

The environmental and human rights organization Global Witness has written to the companies asking them to comment on the allegations against Agropalma. Some of the companies responded, but only made vague statements about the company’s policy and reference to the seals without addressing the allegations or indicating any concrete steps to exclude palm oil26

About the Agropalma seals

Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)

The RSPO label covers around 5,000 companies and NGOs worldwide that claim to promote sustainable and socially responsible palm oil cultivation. Currently, the oil palm plantation area certified by the RSPO is 3.5 million hectares (2022).

According to RSPO, 107,506 hectares – i.e., 100% of Agropalma’s land – have been certified as sustainable and socially responsible under the standard since 201127. Because of the land conflicts at Agropalma, a complaint was filed with RSPO back in 2015. At the end of 2020, it was rejected by RSPO on the grounds that the land dispute was a matter for the Brazilian courts28 29 30. For its part, Agropalma had dismissed the complaints as “absurd lawsuits”31.

In early December 2022, one hundred organizations from around the world – including Rainforest Rescue – issued an open letter condemning RSPO’s greenwashing of palm oil and calling for an end to its certification32.

Palm Oil Innovations Group (POIG)

Agropalma is a founding member of the Palm Oil Innovations Group (POIG), established together with Greenpeace and WWF in 2013. POIG was created by the organizations together with a number of palm oil companies and their customers because of perceived shortcomings in the standards and performance of RSPO.

POIG currently includes three palm oil producers (Agropalma, Daabon, Musim Mas), four palm oil consumers (Danone, Ferrero, L'Oreal, Stephenson) and eight NGOs. Greenpeace has since withdrawn from the organization.

POIG claims to have the world's most stringent requirements for the cultivation and production of palm oil. According to the organization’s website, “POIG focuses on the three thematic areas of environmental responsibility, partnerships with communities including workers’ rights, and corporate and product integrity” 33.

Verification under RSPO and POIG is carried out by accredited certifiers with annual audits and field inspections. The last POIG verification report dated January 31, 2022, contained no complaints regarding Agropalma34:

“No non-conformities were verified as result of documentation analysis and interviews made with managers, coordinators, and Agropalma ́s workers, Union and Communities representative.” The report states no less than nine times: “Agropalma’s and farmers’ areas are private. There is no use of community areas for palm plantations.”

On Greenpeace's Scorecard on Palm Oil Producers, Agropalma ranks first among the companies assessed35. Agropalma also has an excellent score in the Zoological Society of London's SPOTT assessment, with 86 percentage points, including 92 percentage points for compliance with “community, land and labor rights”36.

Bio Suisse

In addition to the ten labels listed above, Agropalma's palm oil refinery Cia Refinadora da Amazonia was also certified with the Swiss Bio Suisse organic label until mid-202237. In 2021, the Swiss smallholder association Uniterre38 complained to Bio Suisse about the certification, which expired in spring 2022 and was not renewed as in previous years. In the periodical Kultur und Politik 3-22 of Bioforum Schweiz39, Laurent Vonwiller of Uniterre sees this as a result of the dialogue with Bio Suisse, which is now bearing fruit. However, Bio Suisse has stated to Rainforest Rescue that “the dialogue between Uniterre and Bio Suisse had no effect on the decision.”

According to Vonwiller, “Bio Suisse lacks the courage to acknowledge that for years, it supported an industrial agribusiness that committed wholesale property title fraud and land grabbing (with the support of RSPO!). It also lacks any signs of solidarity with the displaced communities currently fighting to reclaim the land stolen by Agropalma.”


1 E joio e o trigo (2022). No Pará, quilombolas são encurralados por seguranças armados e encapuzados de fornecedora da Nestlé:

2 Ministério Público del Estado de Pará (2018). Justiça determina bloqueio de matrículas de fazendas da Agropalma:

3 TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA DO ESTADO DO PARÁ (2021). APELACÃO 0803639-54.2018.8.14.0015:

4 Pública (2022). Com inércia do governo, empresas do dendê avançam sobre terras públicas da Amazônia:

5 Valor Económico (2022). Herdeiras de Aloysio Faria colocam Alfa e mais duas empresas à venda:

6 Agropalma (2020). Agropalma Sustainability Report 2019:

7 Agropalma (2020). Agropalma Sustainability Report 2019:

8 AAK (2022). Updated April 2022:

9 ADM (2022). List of supplying mills:

10 Allnatura (2022). Unser Beitrag für Mensch und Erde, page 28:

Allnatura (2022) Häufige Fragen: Palmöl:

11 Bunge (2017). palm oil mill list:

12 Cargill (2022). Cargill Global Mill List - Quarter 2, 2022:

13 Danone (2022). PALM OIL SUPPLIERS & MILLS LIST H2 2021:


15 General Mills (2022). List of supplying mills - January 2022:

General Mills (2022). Statement on responsible palm oil sourcing:

16 Hershey (2022). July through December 2021 Palm Oil Traceability - Mill List:

17 Kellogg (2018). Kellogg Mill List 2018: ;

18 Mars (2021). Mars Simplified Supply Chain Global Palm Oil Mill List:

19 Mondelez (2021). 2021 Palm Oil Mill List:

20 Nestle (2021). Supply Chain Disclosure Palm Oil:

21 Olenex Edible Oils GmbH - Brake (2021). Traceability Summary - Supplies July 2020 - June 2021:

22 PepsiCo (2022). PepsiCo Palm Oil Mill List 2021:

23 PZ Cussons (2021). PZ Cussons Palm Oil Mill List - July 2021:

24 Unilever (2021). 2020 Palm Oil Mills:

25 Upfield (2021). Palm Oil Mill List for Publication:

26 Business and Human Rights Resource Center (2022). Brazil: 20 international brands named by Global Witness as major buyers of palm oil from producers linked to alleged human rights violations:

27 Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil (2022). Agropalma - Annual Communication of Progress 2021:

28 RSPO Complaints Panel (2015). Letter to RSPO Secretariat, Aug. 13, 2015:

29 RSPO Complaints Panel (2015). Letter to RSPO Secretariat, Aug. 31, 2015:

30 RSPO Complaints Panel (2020). Re: Final decision by the Complaints Panel on the Complaint against Agropalma Group (Membership No.:1-0003-04-000-00):

31 RSPO Complaints Panel (2015). Agropalma's official response to false accusations against its behalf:

32 GRAIN (2022). Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil: 19 years is enough:

33 Palm Oil Innovations Group (no date). ABOUT POIG:

34 Palm Oil Innovation Group (2022). Palm Oil Innovation Group Verification Report For Agropalma Group In Tailândia, Acará and Tomé-Açú/Pará, Brazil:

35 Greenpeace (2011). Scorecard on palm oil producers:

36 The Zoological Society of London/SPOTT (2022). Agropalma Group:

37 International Certification Bio Suisse AG (2021). CERTIFICATE Agropalma Group / Cia Refinadora da Amazonia:

38 Uniterre (2022). Dialog zwischen Uniterre und Bio Suisse über die Frage des Bio Suisse Palmöls:

39 Bioforum Schweiz (2022) in Kultur und Politik 3-22. Dialog über Palmöl trägt erste Früchte – mehr Veränderung nötig! Ist Bio-Suisse-Palmöl nachhaltiger als konventionelles Palmöl?

Who's involved?

Whos Involved?

  • 13 May 2024 - Washington DC
    World Bank Land Conference 2024
  • Languages

    Special content


    Latest posts